Table 2

Evaluation of studies on distal to mid-shaft hypospadias

Distal and mid-shaft hypospadiasYearRepair methodComplications (%)Age rangeHypospadiasMean follow-up (months)StatisticsPrognostic factors for complications
El-Sherbiny et al382004TIPU151–22 yearsAll types10MLRMeatal location
Aslam et al142013TIPU73–7 yearsMid-shaft and distal56N/AN/A
Chung et al372012Several (including TIPU)21.40<16 yearsAll types6MLRLocation of hypospadias
Mane et al152013TIPU111–5 yearsDistal23N/AN/A
Aboutaleb232014TIPU209 months to 12 yearsDistal6UnivariateLow or flat UP width
Spinoit et al332015Several24.104 months to 11 yearsAll types23MLRProximal hypospadias (meatal location)
Arlen et al252015Several14.1012 yearsAll types18MLRGlans-Meatus-Shaft (GMS) score
Bush et al212015TIPU12.60<10 yearsAll types7MLRSmall glans size, meatal location and reoperation
Garnier et al292017Several (including TIPU)36.201–16 yearsAll types26MLRAge
Dokter et al32018Several (including TIPU)3110 monthsAll types57MLRProximal meatus or chordee
Chukwubuike et al222019TIPU31Under 15 yearsDistal6UnivariateNo factors
Dokter et al352020Several (including TIPU)191.2–8.9 yearsMid-shaft and distal12MLRNo patient-related prognostic factors
Güler362020TIPU27.70Under 16 yearsAll types20MLRUrethral plate anatomic feature, glanular groove, and glans size
Malhotra et al392020Several (including TIPU)313 months to 10 yearsAll types20.5MLRNo difference in success in terms of meatal location
  • MLR, multivariable logistic regression; ; N/A, not available; TIPU, tubularized incised plate urethroplasty; UP, urethral plate.;