Table 2

Summary outcomes

StudyTechniqueType of repairTotal (n)UCFMSStrictureGDWIRedness/
erythema
BleedingSwelling/edemaFlap necrosisTotal complications
1Cimador et al.12PGMathieu technique: 277 patients (subcoronal hypospadias)
Transverse preputial flap (tubularized or onlay): 59 patients (midshaft or proximal hypospadias)
254171229
PDS82628
2Khalid et al.9PGSnodgrass repair of subcoronal hypospadias100296742
PDS100269439
3Fakhr14PGOnly anterior hypospadias (surgery not mentioned)1005495326
PDS1002350010
4Shirazi et al.15PGAll underwent TIP with dartos flap for distal, mid-penile, and TVS flap for proximal hypospadias2982786445
PDS2851221015
5Mohamed Ali Alaraby et al.13PGSingle-stage repair: 79.3%
Multistage repair: 20.7%.
MAGPI: 47.6%
TIP: 31.4%
Thiersch-Duplay: 20%
Mathieu repair: 1%
5014920017
PDS555224116
  • GD, glans dehiscence; MAGPI, meatal advancement and glanduloplasty; MS, meatal stenosis; PDS, polydioxanone; PG, polyglactin; TIP, tubularized incised plate; UCF, urethrocutaneous fistula; WI, wound infection.