Table 2

Study outcomes

SNStudyType of repairTotal (n)UCFMSGDDiverticulumHOSE scoreWound infectionOperative time (min)Qmax mL/sUrethral strictureSuccess rate
1Mouravas and Sfoungaris7TIP23261092 (72–110)*016/23
GTIP241010115 (100–136)*022/24
2Helmy et al8TIP30010079±911.2±5029/30
GTIP300020106±1211.6±3028/30
3Eldeeb et al 9TIP30110078 (55–99)†028/30
GTIP301010110 (80–140)†028/30
4Sultan et al16TIP30331074±8.0010.89±2.15023/30
GTIP302110102.37±9.2718.59±3.33026/30
5El Shazly et al17TIP25220015.785.2±6.3022/25
GTIP25001015.591.4±6.2024/25
6Changpei et al 20TIP39231013.43±1.0973.81±7.626.81±1.41033/39
GTIP39220014.70±1.1095.91±10.809.91±1.50035/39
7Ahmed et al10TIP53320015.6±0.55085.2±6.3048/53
GTIP54002015.4±1.09091.4±6.5049/54
8Zeina et al19TIP30120050.07±7.28027/30
GTIP30110075.47±9.25026/30
9Mohammed et al18TIP20120075017/20
GTIP21110088019/21
10Patel et al21TIP20320012
GTIP20110110
  • *Mean and range.

  • †Median with range.

  • GD, glans dehiscence; GTIP, grafted TIP; MS, meatal stenosis; TIP, tubularized incised plate; UCF, urethrocutaneous fistula.